Rena Lederman

1.2k citations
31 papers · 584 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Rena Lederman

29 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Rena Lederman
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Anthropology 218
  • Geography, Planning and Development 106
  • Archeology 10
  • General Social Sciences 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 258
Replace Robert Borofsky with:
Robert Borofsky United States
Gillian Cowlishaw Australia
Bernard Hours France
Harriet Whitehead United States
P. Steven Sangren United States
Ronald Niezen Canada
Antonius C. G. M. Robben Netherlands
Harri Englund United Kingdom
Sharon E. Hutchinson United States
Rosalind Shaw United States
Rena Lederman relative to Robert Borofsky United States Robert Borofsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert Borofsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rena Lederman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rena Lederman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rena Lederman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rena Lederman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rena Lederman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rena Lederman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rena Lederman. The network helps show where Rena Lederman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rena Lederman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rena Lederman Line = papers co-authored together Rena Lederman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199999
2 200669
3 198651
4 198840
5 198438
6 200638
7 201835
8 200733
9 199828
10 199326
11 199024
12 199022
13 198614
14 198913
15 200710
16 20068
17 19875
18 20115
19 20055
20 19864

About Rena Lederman

Rena Lederman is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, General Health Professions and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 31 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (6 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (5 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (3 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Indigenous Studies and Ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (218 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (106 citations), Archeology (10 citations), General Social Sciences (21 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (258 citations). Rena Lederman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James Ferguson, Akhil Gupta, Robert Tonkinson, Marilyn Strathern, Edmund Leach, Jerry W. Leach, Martha Macintyre, Bob Simpson, Peter Pels and Saul Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as American Ethnologist, American Anthropologist, Ethnology, Pacific Affairs and Social Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact