Rena Lederman

1.2k citations
39 papers · 664 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Rena Lederman

36 papers receiving 488 citations

Peers

Rena Lederman
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Anthropology 230
  • Geography, Planning and Development 98
  • Archeology 9
  • General Social Sciences 24
  • Sociology and Political Science 301
Replace Antonius C. G. M. Robben with:
Antonius C. G. M. Robben Netherlands
Robert Borofsky United States
Ronald Niezen Canada
Adam Ashforth United States
Bernard Hours France
Frances E. Mascia‐Lees United States
Michael Houseman France
Rijk van Dijk Netherlands
Gillian Cowlishaw Australia
John van Willigen United States
Rena Lederman relative to Antonius C. G. M. Robben Netherlands Antonius C. G. M. Robben's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Antonius C. G. M. Robben · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rena Lederman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rena Lederman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rena Lederman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rena Lederman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rena Lederman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rena Lederman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rena Lederman. The network helps show where Rena Lederman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rena Lederman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rena Lederman Line = papers co-authored together Rena Lederman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999136
2 200671
3 198655
4 201845
5 198441
6 200640
7 200735
8 199832
9 199027
10 199326
11 199026
12 200515
13 198615
14 198914
15 200711
16 201610
17 20068
18 19876
19 20096
20 20055

About Rena Lederman

Rena Lederman is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anthropological Studies and Insights (7 papers), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (6 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (5 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (3 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (230 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (98 citations), Archeology (9 citations), General Social Sciences (24 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (301 citations). Rena Lederman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James Ferguson, Akhil Gupta, Marilyn Strathern, Edmund Leach, Jerry W. Leach, Martha Macintyre, Tessa Minter, James Clifford, Michael Schönhuth and Bob Simpson. Their work appears in journals such as American Ethnologist, American Anthropologist, Current Anthropology, Ethnohistory and Reviews in Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact