Robert Bonek

1.3k citations
17 papers · 82 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Bonek

16 papers receiving 82 citations

Peers

Robert Bonek
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Neurology 37
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 38
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 15
  • Neurology 5
  • Infectious Diseases 10
Replace T. Fujioka with:
T. Fujioka Japan
Zhannat Idrissova Kazakhstan
Johanna Lieb Switzerland
Kerstin Eichstädt Germany
Youssef Sidhom Tunisia
Georg-Christoph Korenke Germany
Dan Milea France
Silvia Muñoz Spain
José Luis Sánchez-Menoyo Spain
Martina Garnero Italy
Robert Bonek relative to T. Fujioka Japan T. Fujioka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
T. Fujioka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Bonek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Bonek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Bonek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Bonek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Bonek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Bonek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Bonek. The network helps show where Robert Bonek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Bonek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Bonek Line = papers co-authored together Robert Bonek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 202016
2 202015
3 202214
4
Demyelinating lesions in the cervical cord in multiple sclerosis 10 years after onset of the disease. Correlation between MRI parameters and clinical course.
20076
5 20235
6 20204
7 20214
8 20224
9 20213
10 20203
11 20202
12 20162
13 20161
14 20231
15
Naturalny przebieg stwardnienia rozsianego
20091
16
[Demyelinating lesions in cervical spinal cord and disability in multiple sclerosis patients].
20041
17 20180

About Robert Bonek

Robert Bonek is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Genetics, Infectious Diseases and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 82 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (7 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (3 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers), Full-Duplex Wireless Communications (2 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (2 papers) and Neurological diseases and metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (37 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (38 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (15 citations), Neurology (5 citations) and Infectious Diseases (10 citations). Robert Bonek has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Slovakia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dawn Langdon, Konrad Rejdak, Dario Cocito, Eduardo Nobile‐Orazio, Angelo Schenone, Zbigniew Król, Piotr Fiedor, Agnieszka Gala‐Błądzińska, Ewa Papuć and Maciej Maciejowski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, International Journal of Medical Sciences, Contemporary Clinical Trials, Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System and European Journal of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact