Robert Alan Skipper
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Evolution and Science Education
- Philosophy, Science, and History
-
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 14
- History of Science and Natural History 1
- History of Science and Medicine 1
- Genetics 3
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics 3
- Journals
- Philosophy of Science (3 papers)Perspectives on Science (2 papers)Biology & Philosophy (2 papers)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (1 paper)Public Health Ethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert Alan Skipper
17 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- History and Philosophy of Science 233
- Genetics 31
- General Decision Sciences 3
- Pharmacy 3
- Philosophy 10
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Alan Skipper
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Alan Skipper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Alan Skipper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Alan Skipper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Alan Skipper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Alan Skipper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Alan Skipper. The network helps show where Robert Alan Skipper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Robert Alan Skipper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 9 | REVISITING THE FISHER-WRIGHT CONTROVERSY | 2009 | 8 |
| 10 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 15 | The R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wright controversy in philosophical focus : theory evaluation in population genetics | 2000 | 2 |
| 16 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1 |
About Robert Alan Skipper
Robert Alan Skipper is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics, Pharmacy, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper), History of Science and Natural History (1 paper), Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper), History of Science and Medicine (1 paper), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (1 paper) and Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (233 citations), Genetics (31 citations), General Decision Sciences (3 citations), Pharmacy (3 citations) and Philosophy (10 citations). Robert Alan Skipper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roberta L. Millstein and Michael R Dietrich. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Perspectives on Science, Biology & Philosophy, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences and Public Health Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.