Public Health Ethics

495 papers and 5.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 495 papers published in Public Health Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Public Health Ethics usually cover General Health Professions (303 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (155 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (76 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in medical practice (129 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (102 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Health Ethics are Jonathan Anomaly, Mark Sheehan, Marcel Verweij, Michael J. Selgelid, A. M. Viens, Jasper Littmann, Per‐Anders Tengland, Angus Dawson, Julian Savulescu and David S. Goldberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Public Health Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Health Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Health Ethics.

Countries where authors publish in Public Health Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Health Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Health Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Health Ethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025