R.‐M. Böhmer

1.1k citations
10 papers · 998 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research 2
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 1
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 2

R.‐M. Böhmer

10 papers receiving 958 citations

Peers

R.‐M. Böhmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Immunology and Allergy 244
  • Cell Biology 283
  • Oncology 398
  • Molecular Biology 587
  • Cancer Research 104
Replace John Nip with:
John Nip United States
Roger Lucas United States
Andreas Enns Germany
Jürgen Moll Germany
Anna Maria Curatola United States
Wouter de Wet United States
Katrina T. Trevor United States
Ajay Shrivastava United States
Thomas Hussenet France
Philippe Pujuguet France
R.‐M. Böhmer relative to John Nip United States John Nip's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
John Nip · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.‐M. Böhmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.‐M. Böhmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.‐M. Böhmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.‐M. Böhmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.‐M. Böhmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.‐M. Böhmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.‐M. Böhmer. The network helps show where R.‐M. Böhmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside R.‐M. Böhmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.‐M. Böhmer Line = papers co-authored together R.‐M. Böhmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1996421
2 1996204
3 1995197
4 197986
5 198128
6
Differential development of fetal and adult haemoglobin profiles in colony culture: isolation of fetal nucleated red cells by two-colour fluorescence labelling.
199828
7 199220
8 198010
9 19982
10 19842

About R.‐M. Böhmer

R.‐M. Böhmer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Surgery, Genetics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 998 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (1 paper), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (1 paper), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper) and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (244 citations), Cell Biology (283 citations), Oncology (398 citations), Molecular Biology (587 citations) and Cancer Research (104 citations). R.‐M. Böhmer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard K. Assoian, Motoaki Ohtsubo, J. M. Roberts, Xiaoyun Zhu, Kerry J. Fowler, Francesca Walker, Edouard C. Nice, Warren S. Alexander, Janine A. Danks and Margaret L. Hibbs. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Proliferation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Cell Biology, Molecular Biology of the Cell and Annals of Hematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact