Rita E. Samper
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Migration, Health and Trauma
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Health top 5%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Papers in
-
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 4
- Child Abuse and Trauma 3
- Migration, Health and Trauma 1
- Health 3
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 3
- Co-authors
- Daniel W. King (4 shared papers)Lynda A. King (4 shared papers)Dawne Vogt (2 shared papers)Jeffrey Knight (1 shared paper)Casey T. Taft (2 shared papers)Christopher I. Eckhardt (2 shared papers)Christopher M. Murphy (1 shared paper)Amy Holtzworth‐Munroe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Military Psychology (2 papers)Journal of Interpersonal Violence (2 papers)Journal of Traumatic Stress (2 papers)Psychology of Women Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Rita E. Samper
7 papers receiving 971 citations
Rita E. Samper's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Clinical Psychology 774
- Health 199
- Gender Studies 93
- Occupational Therapy 29
- General Health Professions 172
Countries citing papers authored by Rita E. Samper
This map shows the geographic impact of Rita E. Samper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita E. Samper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita E. Samper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rita E. Samper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita E. Samper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita E. Samper. The network helps show where Rita E. Samper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Rita E. Samper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory: A Collection of Measures for Studying Deployment-Related Experiences of Military Personnel and Veterans Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 501 |
| 2 | 2004 | 170 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 88 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 80 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 76 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 29 |
About Rita E. Samper
Rita E. Samper is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (1 paper), Migration, Health and Trauma (1 paper) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (774 citations), Health (199 citations), Gender Studies (93 citations), Occupational Therapy (29 citations) and General Health Professions (172 citations). Rita E. Samper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel W. King, Lynda A. King, Dawne Vogt, Jeffrey Knight, Casey T. Taft, Christopher I. Eckhardt, Christopher M. Murphy, Amy Holtzworth‐Munroe, Laura Suhr and James A. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Military Psychology, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Journal of Traumatic Stress and Psychology of Women Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.