Rick P. Thomas

35 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Rick P. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • General Decision Sciences 201
  • Family Practice 40
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 184
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 115
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 95
Replace Amber M. Sprenger with:
Amber M. Sprenger United States
Benjamin Margolin Rottman United States
Björn Meder Germany
Kimihiko Yamagishi Japan
Janet Grassia United States
Stanley D. Fisher United States
Ana M. Franco‐Watkins United States
Tomás Lejarraga Germany
Michael A. Bishop United States
Jean-Paul Caverni France
Rick P. Thomas relative to Amber M. Sprenger United States Amber M. Sprenger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Amber M. Sprenger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rick P. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rick P. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rick P. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rick P. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rick P. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rick P. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rick P. Thomas. The network helps show where Rick P. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rick P. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rick P. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Rick P. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008158
2 200898
3 201346
4 201541
5 201339
6 201936
7 201036
8 201132
9 201431
10 201028
11 200622
12 201218
13 201218
14 201814
15 200914
16 201212
17 20127
18 20136
19 20145
20 20204

About Rick P. Thomas

Rick P. Thomas is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and Family Practice, having authored 43 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (7 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (3 papers) and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (201 citations), Family Practice (40 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (184 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (95 citations). Rick P. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. P. Dougherty, Amber M. Sprenger, J. Isaiah Harbison, Ana M. Franco‐Watkins, Jason D. Dana, Eddy J. Davelaar, Renee A. McPherson, Darrel M. Kingfield, Pamela L. Heinselman and Jorge L. Mendoza. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Frontiers in Psychology, Memory & Cognition and Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact