Michael A. Bishop

52 papers receiving 844 citations

Peers

Michael A. Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • General Decision Sciences 148
  • History and Philosophy of Science 198
  • Philosophy 291
  • General Psychology 16
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 202
Replace K. I. Manktelow with:
K. I. Manktelow United Kingdom
Ruma Falk Israel
Bernard Berofsky United States
Russell Revlin United States
Erik J Olsson Sweden
Matthew Haigh United Kingdom
Benjamin Margolin Rottman United States
Michael H. Baumgardner United States
Felipe Romero Netherlands
Dagfinn Føllesdal Norway
Michael A. Bishop relative to K. I. Manktelow United Kingdom K. I. Manktelow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
K. I. Manktelow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Bishop. The network helps show where Michael A. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael A. Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Michael A. Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005175
2 2002117
3 200670
4 200655
5 199647
6 199946
7 201238
8 200237
9 200937
10 200635
11 200033
12 199728
13
Stich and His Critics
200926
14 200625
15 199820
16 199818
17 200018
18 202016
19 201915
20 200512

About Michael A. Bishop

Michael A. Bishop is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, General Decision Sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 66 papers that have together received 993 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (4 papers), Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (4 papers) and Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (148 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (198 citations), Philosophy (291 citations), General Psychology (16 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (202 citations). Michael A. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. D. Trout, Sanjay Rao, Richard J. Samuels, Stephen Stich, Yu-Wei Eric Sung, Kunwadee Sripanidkulchai, Stephen P. Stich, Susan Nolen–Hoeksema, Judith M. Larson and John H. Bishop. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Integrated Care, Philosophy of Science, Philosophy Compass, Philosophical Studies and Episteme.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact