Richard E. Dean

41 papers receiving 895 citations

Peers

Richard E. Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 82
  • Emergency Medicine 71
  • Hepatology 57
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 119
  • Surgery 295
Replace Mark Stovroff with:
Mark Stovroff United States
S. Braude United Kingdom
Martina David Germany
Melvin L. Morganroth United States
S. Wolff Germany
F Mühlbacher Austria
Jeffrey H. Pruitt United States
GORDON D. BURTCH United States
H. Dittmer Germany
Caveh Madjdpour Switzerland
Richard E. Dean relative to Mark Stovroff United States Mark Stovroff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Mark Stovroff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Dean. The network helps show where Richard E. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Dean Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001103
2 200377
3 199265
4 199759
5 198947
6 198446
7 199143
8 198539
9 196437
10 198436
11 198435
12 198829
13 199129
14 200127
15 198426
16 200125
17 199823
18 198722
19 200021
20 199419

About Richard E. Dean

Richard E. Dean is a scholar working on Surgery, Physiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (6 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (5 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (4 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (4 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (82 citations), Emergency Medicine (71 citations), Hepatology (57 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (119 citations) and Surgery (295 citations). Richard E. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Irshad H. Chaudry, Ping Wang, Alfred Ayala, Zheng F. Ba, James M. Harkema, Jack R. Harkema, Benjamin D. Mosher, Elahé T Crockett, Rabie N. Stephan and Mark McCamish. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Surgical Research, Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact