Mark Hills
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Papers in
-
- Logic, programming, and type systems 28
-
- Software Engineering Research 16
- Web Application Security Vulnerabilities 6
- Co-authors
- Peter M. Lansdorp (14 shared papers)Geraldine Aubert (2 shared papers)Grigore Roşu (15 shared papers)Ester Falconer (6 shared papers)Ashley D. Sanders (5 shared papers)Paul Klint (8 shared papers)Hilda A. Pickett (3 shared papers)Roger R. Reddel (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Blood (4 papers)Science of Computer Programming (2 papers)Genome Research (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Nucleic Acids Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Mark Hills
57 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Aging 87
- Physiology 589
- Software 93
- Molecular Biology 752
- Cancer Research 109
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hills
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hills more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hills
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hills. The network helps show where Mark Hills may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Hills, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 264 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 133 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 120 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 117 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 80 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 70 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 44 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 44 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 38 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 18 | An Executable Rewriting Logic Semantics of K-Scheme | 2007 | 18 |
| 19 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 17 |
About Mark Hills
Mark Hills is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Software, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (28 papers), Software Engineering Research (16 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (16 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (10 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (9 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (6 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers) and Web Application Security Vulnerabilities (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (87 citations), Physiology (589 citations), Software (93 citations), Molecular Biology (752 citations) and Cancer Research (109 citations). Mark Hills has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Lansdorp, Geraldine Aubert, Grigore Roşu, Ester Falconer, Ashley D. Sanders, Paul Klint, Hilda A. Pickett, Roger R. Reddel, Michael D. Stutz and Dimitri Conomos. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Science of Computer Programming, Genome Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.