R.I. Woods

616 citations
13 papers · 397 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • History top 2%
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Health top 10%
    • Health disparities and outcomes

Papers in

R.I. Woods

13 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

R.I. Woods
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • History 85
  • Health 56
  • Economics and Econometrics 163
  • Demography 69
  • Gender Studies 46
Replace Jude Woodward with:
Jude Woodward United Kingdom
Francesco Scalone Italy
Jean Bourgeois‐Pichat United States
Surinder M. Bhardwaj United States
R. G. Brown United Kingdom
Penny Kane Australia
Thomas N. Maloney United States
Guy Desplanques France
Diego Ramiro Fariñas Spain
Sujit Choudhry Germany
R.I. Woods relative to Jude Woodward United Kingdom Jude Woodward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Jude Woodward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.I. Woods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.I. Woods's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.I. Woods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.I. Woods more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.I. Woods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.I. Woods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.I. Woods. The network helps show where R.I. Woods may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside R.I. Woods, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.I. Woods Line = papers co-authored together R.I. Woods links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1989136
2 198894
3 198740
4 197635
5 200622
6 198518
7 198115
8 198412
9 197711
10 19785
11 20034
12 19773
13 20032

About R.I. Woods

R.I. Woods is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, History and Demography, having authored 13 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (3 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (3 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (85 citations), Health (56 citations), Economics and Econometrics (163 citations), Demography (69 citations) and Gender Studies (46 citations). R.I. Woods has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jude Woodward, Andrew Hinde, Frans van Poppel, W. T. S. Gould and Paula Williamson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biosocial Science, Population Studies, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, Urban Studies and Environment and Planning A Economy and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact