Renu Chugh

87 papers receiving 782 citations

Peers

Renu Chugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Geometry and Topology 420
  • Numerical Analysis 177
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 318
  • Mathematical Physics 170
  • Modeling and Simulation 83
Replace Agamirza E. Bashirov with:
Agamirza E. Bashirov Cyprus
Krzysztof Kurdyka France
S.N. Chow United States
Ali Özyapıcı Cyprus
Fritz Colonius Germany
Mamta Rani India
Yosef Yomdin Israel
Vera Zeidan United States
Hȧrald K. Wimmer Germany
Zengqin Zhao China
Renu Chugh relative to Agamirza E. Bashirov Cyprus Agamirza E. Bashirov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Agamirza E. Bashirov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Renu Chugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Renu Chugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renu Chugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renu Chugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Renu Chugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renu Chugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renu Chugh. The network helps show where Renu Chugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Renu Chugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Renu Chugh Line = papers co-authored together Renu Chugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201286
2 201465
3 201050
4 202344
5 201838
6 200136
7 202231
8 201729
9 201023
10 201222
11 201221
12 201918
13 201616
14 202014
15 201214
16 201913
17 202213
18 201912
19 202312
20 202412

About Renu Chugh

Renu Chugh is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Physics, having authored 112 papers that have together received 846 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (51 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (44 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (21 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (15 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (15 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (13 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (9 papers) and Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (420 citations), Numerical Analysis (177 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (318 citations), Mathematical Physics (170 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (83 citations). Renu Chugh has collaborated with scholars based in India, Saudi Arabia and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Ashish Ashish, Vivek Kumar, Sanjay Kumar, Mamta Rani, Jinde Cao, Mihai Postolache, Krzysztof Gdawiec, Nawab Hussain, Chuangxia Huang and Arif Rafiq. Their work appears in journals such as Chaos Solitons & Fractals, Abstract and Applied Analysis, Symmetry, Numerical Algorithms and SpringerPlus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact