Numerical Algorithms

49.8k citations
3.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
    • Numerical methods for differential equations
    • Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations
    • Differential Equations and Numerical Methods
    • Fractional Differential Equations Solutions

Papers in

    • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research 752
    • Numerical methods for differential equations 631
    • Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations 601
    • Differential Equations and Numerical Methods 456
    • Fractional Differential Equations Solutions 524

Numerical Algorithms

3.3k papers receiving 46.6k citations

Peers

Numerical Algorithms
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
  • Numerical Analysis 23.9k
  • Modeling and Simulation 9.4k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 19.1k
  • Computational Mathematics 659
  • Applied Mathematics 6.3k
Replace BIT Numerical Mathematics with:
BIT Numerical Mathematics United States
Applied Numerical Mathematics China
Computer Physics Communications United States
Journal of Scientific Computing China
International Journal of Computer Mathematics China
Journal of the Franklin Institute China
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation China
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications United States
Mathematics China
Applied Mathematical Modelling China
Numerical Algorithms relative to BIT Numerical Mathematics United States BIT Numerical Mathematics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
BIT Numerical Mathematics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Numerical Algorithms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Numerical Algorithms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Numerical Algorithms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Numerical Algorithms more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Numerical Algorithms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Numerical Algorithms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Numerical Algorithms.

About Numerical Algorithms

The 3.6k papers published in Numerical Algorithms in the last decades have received a total of 49.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Numerical Algorithms usually cover Numerical Analysis (1.9k papers), Modeling and Simulation (532 papers), Computational Mathematics (63 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.7k papers) and Applied Mathematics (634 papers) specifically the topics of Matrix Theory and Algorithms (989 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (752 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (631 papers), Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (601 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (574 papers), Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (524 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (456 papers) and Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (359 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Numerical Algorithms are Per Christian Hansen, Yair Censor, Tommy Elfving, Kai Diethelm, Neville J. Ford, Lothar Reichel, Neculai Andrei, Thomas Gerstner, Michael Griebel and Zhong‐Zhi Bai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact