Numerical Algorithms

53.6k citations
3.7k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
    • Numerical methods for differential equations
    • Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations
    • Differential Equations and Numerical Methods
    • Fractional Differential Equations Solutions

Papers in

    • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research 760
    • Numerical methods for differential equations 651
    • Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations 608
    • Differential Equations and Numerical Methods 462
    • Fractional Differential Equations Solutions 531

Numerical Algorithms

3.4k papers receiving 50.4k citations

Peers

Numerical Algorithms
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Numerical Analysis 25.2k
  • Modeling and Simulation 9.9k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 20.3k
  • Computational Mathematics 717
  • Computational Mechanics 13.3k
Replace BIT Numerical Mathematics with:
BIT Numerical Mathematics United States
IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis United Kingdom
Applied Numerical Mathematics China
Computer Physics Communications United States
Journal of Scientific Computing China
International Journal of Computer Mathematics China
Mathematics China
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications United States
Computing Germany
Applied Mathematical Modelling China
Numerical Algorithms relative to BIT Numerical Mathematics United States BIT Numerical Mathematics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
BIT Numerical Mathematics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Numerical Algorithms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Numerical Algorithms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Numerical Algorithms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Numerical Algorithms more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Numerical Algorithms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Numerical Algorithms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Numerical Algorithms.

About Numerical Algorithms

The 3.7k papers published in Numerical Algorithms in the last decades have received a total of 53.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Numerical Algorithms usually cover Numerical Analysis (2.0k papers), Modeling and Simulation (540 papers), Computational Mathematics (64 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.7k papers) and Applied Mathematics (647 papers) specifically the topics of Matrix Theory and Algorithms (1.0k papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (760 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (651 papers), Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (608 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (592 papers), Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (531 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (462 papers) and Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (361 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Numerical Algorithms are Per Christian Hansen, Yair Censor, Tommy Elfving, Kai Diethelm, Neville J. Ford, Neculai Andrei, Michael Griebel, Thomas V. Gerstner, Lothar Reichel and Zhong‐Zhi Bai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact