René Tanious

27 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

René Tanious
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 215
  • Management Science and Operations Research 101
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 111
  • Statistics and Probability 47
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 17
Replace Kristynn J. Sullivan with:
Kristynn J. Sullivan United States
Yvonnick Noël France
Marc E. Gessaroli Canada
Art Dowdy United States
Douglas E. Kostewicz United States
Carmen Hagemeister Germany
Peter M. Nelson United States
Denys Brand United States
H. C. A. Dale United Kingdom
Jean‐Christophe Goulet‐Pelletier Canada
René Tanious relative to Kristynn J. Sullivan United States Kristynn J. Sullivan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Kristynn J. Sullivan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by René Tanious

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of René Tanious's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by René Tanious with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites René Tanious more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by René Tanious

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by René Tanious. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by René Tanious. The network helps show where René Tanious may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside René Tanious, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with René Tanious Line = papers co-authored together René Tanious links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202052
2 202237
3 201933
4 201926
5 202025
6 201921
7 201921
8 201916
9 202113
10 202412
11 201912
12 202211
13 202010
14 20199
15 20229
16 20228
17 20245
18 20205
19 20184
20 20224

About René Tanious

René Tanious is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability and Clinical Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (24 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (20 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Software Engineering Research (2 papers) and Product Development and Customization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (215 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (101 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations), Statistics and Probability (47 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (17 citations). René Tanious has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Spain and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Onghena, Rumen Manolov, Bart Michiels, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Belén Fernández‐Castilla, Johan W.S. Vlaeyen, Wolfgang Jacquet, Pierre Gérain, Elke Van Hoof and Tracy L. Tylka. Their work appears in journals such as Behavior Modification, Behavior Research Methods, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact