René Collier

31 papers receiving 977 citations

Peers

René Collier
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 924
  • Linguistics and Language 304
  • Language and Linguistics 351
  • Signal Processing 185
  • Artificial Intelligence 540
Replace S.G. Nooteboom with:
S.G. Nooteboom Netherlands
Francis Nolan United Kingdom
Esther Grabe United Kingdom
Ewa Jacewicz United States
Louis Goldstein United States
Rebecca M. Dauer United States
Z. S. Bond United States
Harris Winitz United States
Robin J. Lickley United Kingdom
Mariapaola D’Imperio France
René Collier relative to S.G. Nooteboom Netherlands S.G. Nooteboom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S.G. Nooteboom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by René Collier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of René Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by René Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites René Collier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by René Collier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by René Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by René Collier. The network helps show where René Collier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside René Collier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with René Collier Line = papers co-authored together René Collier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969299
2 1990261
3 199093
4 197591
5 198271
6 197569
7 199352
8 199447
9 199745
10 199644
11 199425
12 198821
13 197914
14 199212
15 197512
16 197911
17 199611
18 199310
19 19827
20
On the interaction of accentuation and intonation in Dutch
19797

About René Collier

René Collier is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Language and Linguistics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (28 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (11 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (5 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (3 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (924 citations), Linguistics and Language (304 citations), Language and Linguistics (351 citations), Signal Processing (185 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (540 citations). René Collier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Arnon D. Cohen, J. ’t Hart, Marc Swerts, Angelien A. Sanderman, A. Cohen, Jacques Terken, Louis ten Bosch, Roel Smits, Jean Vroomen and D.G. Bouwhuis. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Language and Speech, Speech Communication, Journal of Phonetics and IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact