René Collier

32 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

René Collier
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Linguistics and Language 458
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
  • Language and Linguistics 502
  • Artificial Intelligence 630
  • Signal Processing 201
Replace Louis Goldstein with:
Louis Goldstein United States
Cécile Fougeron France
Esther Grabe United Kingdom
Alice Faber United States
Sónia Frota Portugal
Francis Nolan United Kingdom
John H. Esling Canada
Susanne Gahl United States
Bronwen G. Evans United Kingdom
Linda Lombardi United States
René Collier relative to Louis Goldstein United States Louis Goldstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Louis Goldstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by René Collier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of René Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by René Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites René Collier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by René Collier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by René Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by René Collier. The network helps show where René Collier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside René Collier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with René Collier Line = papers co-authored together René Collier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969372
2
A Perceptual Study of Intonation: An Experimental-Phonetic Approach to Speech Melody
1990369
3 1990128
4 1975122
5 197588
6 198272
7 199363
8 199447
9 199644
10 199744
11 199428
12 198825
13 197914
14 199214
15 197913
16 197513
17 199312
18 199610
19
On the interaction of accentuation and intonation in Dutch
19799
20 19829

About René Collier

René Collier is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (29 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (10 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (7 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (5 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (3 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers) and Music and Audio Processing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (458 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations), Language and Linguistics (502 citations), Artificial Intelligence (630 citations) and Signal Processing (201 citations). René Collier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Arnon Dov Cohen, J. ’t Hart, Marc G. J. Swerts, Angelien A. Sanderman, Antonie Cohen, Jean Vroomen, Jacques M. B. Terken, Roel Smits, Louis ten Bosch and Don G. Bouwhuis. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Language and Speech, Speech Communication, Journal of Phonetics and Linguistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact