Renáta Németh

42 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers

Renáta Németh
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • General Health Professions 202
  • General Social Sciences 14
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 66
Replace Farrell J. Lloyd with:
Farrell J. Lloyd United States
Tim Grant United Kingdom
Alexandra Valencia‐Peris Spain
Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths United Kingdom
Robert Hogenraad Belgium
Kathrene Conway United States
Sonia Colina United States
Marco Bani Italy
Basabi R. Mukherji United States
Ignaas Devisch Belgium
Renáta Németh relative to Farrell J. Lloyd United States Farrell J. Lloyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Farrell J. Lloyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Renáta Németh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Renáta Németh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renáta Németh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renáta Németh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Renáta Németh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renáta Németh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renáta Németh. The network helps show where Renáta Németh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Renáta Németh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Renáta Németh Line = papers co-authored together Renáta Németh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007122
2 200990
3
[Health-related quality of life of the Hungarian population].
200348
4
[Dietary survey in Hungary, 2003-2004].
200530
5 202029
6 201527
7 201523
8 202122
9 202120
10 200715
11 201615
12 200713
13 202213
14 202112
15 201310
16 202110
17 20218
18 20147
19 20236
20 20225

About Renáta Németh

Renáta Németh is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 46 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health via Writing (7 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (6 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (4 papers), Romani and Gypsy Studies (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (3 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (202 citations), General Social Sciences (14 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (66 citations). Renáta Németh has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Zoltán Vokó, Karolina Kósa, György Széles, Ágota Szende, Gábor P. Háden, Miklós Török, István Winkler, Zsigmond Kósa, László Kardos and Martin McKee. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Information Communication & Society, Developmental Neuroscience, Quality & Quantity and Ear and Hearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact