Adam Ashforth

1.6k citations
38 papers · 955 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Adam Ashforth

34 papers receiving 725 citations

Peers

Adam Ashforth
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Anthropology 226
  • Sociology and Political Science 460
  • Religious studies 83
  • Infectious Diseases 126
  • Economics and Econometrics 103
Replace Isak Niehaus with:
Isak Niehaus United Kingdom
Deborah Durham United States
Rosalind Shaw United States
Nancy Rose Hunt United States
Matthew C. Gutmann United States
Johan Rasanayagam United Kingdom
Wolé Soyinka United States
Pamela Reynolds United States
Arthur Kleinman United States
Antonius C. G. M. Robben Netherlands
Adam Ashforth relative to Isak Niehaus United Kingdom Isak Niehaus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Isak Niehaus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Ashforth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Ashforth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Ashforth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Ashforth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Ashforth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Ashforth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Ashforth. The network helps show where Adam Ashforth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Adam Ashforth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam Ashforth Line = papers co-authored together Adam Ashforth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Witchcraft, Violence, and Democracy in South Africa
2005244
2 2002106
3 200092
4 199084
5 199864
6 200556
7 199846
8
Of secrecy and the commonplace : Witchcraft and power in Soweto
199641
9 201530
10 200523
11 201122
12
Weighing Manhood in Soweto
199918
13 201417
14
AIDS, Witchcraft, and the Problem of Power in Post-Apartheid South Africa
200116
15 201416
16 201513
17 199112
18 20099
19
Chasing shadows : Santu Mofokeng, thirty years of photographic essays
20116
20 19975

About Adam Ashforth

Adam Ashforth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics, Infectious Diseases and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 38 papers that have together received 955 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (13 papers), African Studies and Ethnography (13 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (13 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (226 citations), Sociology and Political Science (460 citations), Religious studies (83 citations), Infectious Diseases (126 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (103 citations). Adam Ashforth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Nicoli Nattrass and SUSAN COTTS WATKINS. Their work appears in journals such as African Studies Review, Journal of Historical Sociology, Social research, Sociological Forum and Public Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact