Reeva Lederman

100 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Reeva Lederman
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Applied Psychology 710
  • Human-Computer Interaction 189
  • Health Informatics 44
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 27
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 242
Replace Madhu C Reddy with:
Madhu C Reddy United States
Lex van Velsen Netherlands
Dorian Peters Australia
Camille Nebeker United States
Katie A. Siek United States
Jina Huh United States
Ahmet Baki Kocaballi Australia
Talya Miron‐Shatz Israel
Renwen Zhang Singapore
Daniel A. Epstein United States
Reeva Lederman relative to Madhu C Reddy United States Madhu C Reddy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
Madhu C Reddy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reeva Lederman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reeva Lederman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reeva Lederman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reeva Lederman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reeva Lederman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reeva Lederman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reeva Lederman. The network helps show where Reeva Lederman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Reeva Lederman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reeva Lederman Line = papers co-authored together Reeva Lederman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012179
2 2017148
3 2014119
4 201788
5 201886
6 201381
7 201359
8 202259
9 201558
10 202056
11 201255
12 202252
13 202247
14 201646
15 201744
16 201443
17 201442
18 201936
19 200635
20 202033

About Reeva Lederman

Reeva Lederman is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Health Information Management, Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science and Management Information Systems, having authored 104 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (21 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (14 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (9 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (9 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (7 papers) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (710 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (189 citations), Health Informatics (44 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (27 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (242 citations). Reeva Lederman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Greg Wadley, John Gleeson, Mario Álvarez‐Jiménez, Simon D’Alfonso, Sarah Bendall, Jenny Waycott, Patrick D. McGorry, S. Chang, Stephen P. Smith and Simon Rice. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, JMIR Mental Health, Schizophrenia Research, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction and European Journal of Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact