Reed Maxwell

10 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers

Reed Maxwell
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 103
  • General Psychology 9
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 89
  • Clinical Psychology 84
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 52
Replace Susanne M. Bauer with:
Susanne M. Bauer Austria
Jordan B. Hiller United States
Raechel Drew Hungary
Celine De Meulemeester Belgium
Rebecca Pinto United Kingdom
Lee Brauer United States
Seon-Kyeong Jang South Korea
Ouardia Otmani France
Katherine L. Forthman United States
Taiju Yamaguchi Japan
Reed Maxwell relative to Susanne M. Bauer Austria Susanne M. Bauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Susanne M. Bauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reed Maxwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reed Maxwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reed Maxwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reed Maxwell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reed Maxwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reed Maxwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reed Maxwell. The network helps show where Reed Maxwell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Reed Maxwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reed Maxwell Line = papers co-authored together Reed Maxwell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201982
2 202247
3 201730
4 201225
5
Do Hypnosis and Mindfulness Practices Inhabit a Common Domain? Implications for Research, Clinical Practice, and Forensic Science
201213
6 20159
7 20188
8 20168
9
When worlds combine: Synthesizing hypnosis, mindfulness, and acceptance-based approaches to psychotherapy and smoking cessation.
20163
10 20192
11 20181

About Reed Maxwell

Reed Maxwell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers), Mind wandering and attention (2 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (103 citations), General Psychology (9 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (89 citations), Clinical Psychology (84 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (52 citations). Reed Maxwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Steven Jay Lynn, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Harald Merckelbach, Dalena van Heugten–van der Kloet, Vladimir Miskovic, Joseph P. Green, Chui‐De Chiu, Craig P. Polizzi, Gregory P. Strauss and Anne Malaktaris. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, Consciousness and Cognition, Clinical Psychology Review, Psychopathology and Annual Review of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact