Reed Maxwell

482 citations
9 papers · 191 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Reed Maxwell

9 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers

Reed Maxwell
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 92
  • General Psychology 7
  • Clinical Psychology 93
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
Replace Adriano Zanello with:
Adriano Zanello Switzerland
Ulrich Bahrke Germany
Nikolas Heim United Kingdom
Jordan B. Hiller United States
Eline M. Vissia United Kingdom
Nicola Sambuco United States
Ioannis Malogiannis Greece
C. Mundt Germany
J Zubin United States
Emily R. Perkins United States
Reed Maxwell relative to Adriano Zanello Switzerland Adriano Zanello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Adriano Zanello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reed Maxwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reed Maxwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reed Maxwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reed Maxwell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reed Maxwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reed Maxwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reed Maxwell. The network helps show where Reed Maxwell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Reed Maxwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reed Maxwell Line = papers co-authored together Reed Maxwell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201970
2 202239
3 201728
4 201221
5
Do Hypnosis and Mindfulness Practices Inhabit a Common Domain? Implications for Research, Clinical Practice, and Forensic Science
201211
6 20187
7 20167
8 20156
9
When worlds combine: Synthesizing hypnosis, mindfulness, and acceptance-based approaches to psychotherapy and smoking cessation.
20162

About Reed Maxwell

Reed Maxwell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 191 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers), Mind wandering and attention (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (92 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Clinical Psychology (93 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (78 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (51 citations). Reed Maxwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Steven Jay Lynn, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Harald Merckelbach, Dalena van Heugten–van der Kloet, Vladimir Miskovic, Joseph P. Green, Craig P. Polizzi, Chui‐De Chiu, Anne Malaktaris and Gregory P. Strauss. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, Consciousness and Cognition, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Clinical Psychology Review and Imagination Cognition and Personality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact