Reed E. Drews

40 papers receiving 989 citations

Peers

Reed E. Drews
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Dermatology 125
  • Internal Medicine 27
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 188
  • Hematology 76
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 113
Replace Urshila Durani with:
Urshila Durani United States
Kenneth J. Woodside United States
Ranjan Pathak United States
Alex J. Crandon Australia
John G. Gorman United States
B. J. Boughton United Kingdom
Thomas V. Jones United States
E. Franssen Canada
Jacqueline M. Stouthard Netherlands
Marek S. Poniewierski United States
Reed E. Drews relative to Urshila Durani United States Urshila Durani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Urshila Durani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reed E. Drews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reed E. Drews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reed E. Drews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reed E. Drews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reed E. Drews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reed E. Drews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reed E. Drews. The network helps show where Reed E. Drews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Reed E. Drews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reed E. Drews Line = papers co-authored together Reed E. Drews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000185
2 2006116
3 200391
4 200084
5 200471
6 200848
7 200644
8 200042
9 201739
10 200830
11 200029
12 200026
13 200521
14
Purpose of admission and resource use during cancer hospitalizations.
199119
15 199218
16 200617
17 200116
18 199215
19 200012
20 202410

About Reed E. Drews

Reed E. Drews is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Dermatology, Genetics, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (6 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (3 papers), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (2 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (2 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2 papers) and Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (125 citations), Internal Medicine (27 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (188 citations), Hematology (76 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (113 citations). Reed E. Drews has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ellen P. McCarthy, Lisa I. Iezzoni, Steven E. Weinberger, Joanne Lynn, Zhenshao Zhong, Russell S. Phillips, Long Ngo, Richard G. Roetzheim, Marshall E. Kadin and Thomas N. Chirikos. Their work appears in journals such as Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Internal Medicine and Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact