Rebekah E. Dumm

17 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Rebekah E. Dumm
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Molecular Medicine 34
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 12
  • Immunology 101
  • Epidemiology 153
  • Cancer Research 66
Replace Jialong Qi with:
Jialong Qi China
Patrick Bättig Switzerland
Dandan Dong China
Aditi Aditi United States
Melissa Hamilton United States
Joy Fleming China
Roger Astley United States
Jaffre J. Athman United States
Hadar Cohen Israel
Rebekah E. Dumm relative to Jialong Qi China Jialong Qi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
Jialong Qi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rebekah E. Dumm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebekah E. Dumm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebekah E. Dumm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebekah E. Dumm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebekah E. Dumm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebekah E. Dumm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebekah E. Dumm. The network helps show where Rebekah E. Dumm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rebekah E. Dumm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rebekah E. Dumm Line = papers co-authored together Rebekah E. Dumm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017175
2 2017109
3 201736
4 201536
5 201928
6 201923
7 201922
8 202218
9 202010
10 20199
11 20244
12 20233
13 20243
14 20242
15 20212
16 20241
17 20211
18 20211
19 20250
20 20250

About Rebekah E. Dumm

Rebekah E. Dumm is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Immunology, Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Influenza Virus Research Studies (6 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (5 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (4 papers), interferon and immune responses (4 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (34 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (12 citations), Immunology (101 citations), Epidemiology (153 citations) and Cancer Research (66 citations). Rebekah E. Dumm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Botswana and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas S. Heaton, Edward M. Kennedy, Brook E. Heaton, Hal P. Bogerd, Alfred T. Harding, David Courtney, Bryan R. Cullen, Kevin Tsai, Matthew T. Sacco and David Sachs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Cell Reports, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Nature Communications and Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact