Rachel E. White

27 papers receiving 823 citations

Peers

Rachel E. White
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Applied Psychology 102
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 204
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 159
  • Occupational Therapy 49
  • General Decision Sciences 22
Replace Neil Kirby with:
Neil Kirby Australia
Atika Khurana United States
Michael W. Passer United States
Hugo Carretero‐Dios Spain
Darío Díaz Spain
Paula Magalhães Portugal
Serena Petrocchi Switzerland
Suzanne M. Miller United States
Sean C. Murphy Australia
Christophe Gernigon France
Rachel E. White relative to Neil Kirby Australia Neil Kirby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Neil Kirby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel E. White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel E. White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel E. White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel E. White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel E. White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel E. White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel E. White. The network helps show where Rachel E. White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel E. White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel E. White Line = papers co-authored together Rachel E. White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013125
2 201697
3 201592
4 201684
5 201477
6 201755
7 201549
8 200546
9 201542
10 202137
11 201827
12 201326
13 202121
14 201318
15 202115
16 201413
17 201310
18
The Nature and Extent of Bullying in Schools in the North of Ireland
200710
19 20215
20 20235

About Rachel E. White

Rachel E. White is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 870 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Early Childhood Education and Development (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Youth Development and Social Support (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (102 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (204 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (159 citations), Occupational Therapy (49 citations) and General Decision Sciences (22 citations). Rachel E. White has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie M. Carlson, Angela Duckworth, Ethan Kross, Annie Shearer, James J. Gross, P.J. Tobin, Sheena D. Brown, Catherine Schaefer, Brian M. Galla and Rachel B. Thibodeau‐Nielsen. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Child Development, Social Development and Continental Shelf Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact