R. Testa

760 citations
18 papers · 540 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Gambling Behavior and Treatments 5
    • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 3
    • COVID-19 and Mental Health 2
    • Mental Health Treatment and Access 4
    • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 2

R. Testa

16 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

R. Testa
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Biological Psychiatry 29
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 144
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 167
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 19
  • Clinical Psychology 88
Replace Mélissa L. Lévesque with:
Mélissa L. Lévesque Canada
М. В. Алфимова Russia
Kentaro Morita Japan
Sarah Trost Germany
Linda A. Antonucci Italy
Samata Sharma United States
Orwa Dandash Australia
Wu Jeong Hwang South Korea
Alison Merikangas United States
Nora S. Vyas United Kingdom
R. Testa relative to Mélissa L. Lévesque Canada Mélissa L. Lévesque's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mélissa L. Lévesque · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Testa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Testa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Testa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Testa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Testa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Testa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Testa. The network helps show where R. Testa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Testa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Testa Line = papers co-authored together R. Testa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2011254
2 2012109
3 201268
4 202423
5 201417
6 202115
7 201712
8 202112
9 202112
10 20175
11 20133
12 20123
13
The use of virtual reality in assessment of executive function following traumatic brain injury
20083
14 20172
15 20151
16 20131
17 20170
18 20170

About R. Testa

R. Testa is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (29 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (144 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (167 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (19 citations) and Clinical Psychology (88 citations). R. Testa has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Christos Pantelis, Nitin Gogtay, Nora S. Vyas, Stephen J. Wood, Jennie Ponsford, Pauleen C. Bennett, Efstratios Skafidas, Gursharan Chana, Ian Everall and Paolo Grandinetti. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Molecular Psychiatry and Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact