Giulia Conte

32 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Giulia Conte
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Clinical Psychology 175
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 127
  • Internal Medicine 18
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 69
Replace Cong Zhou with:
Cong Zhou China
Keren Bachi United States
Núria Pujol Spain
Eric Kelleher Ireland
Jianbai Liu China
Michele De Prisco Italy
Wei Qi China
Mohsin Maqbool United States
Guohua Xia United States
Prapti Gautam United States
Giulia Conte relative to Cong Zhou China Cong Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Cong Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giulia Conte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giulia Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giulia Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giulia Conte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giulia Conte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giulia Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giulia Conte. The network helps show where Giulia Conte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giulia Conte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giulia Conte Line = papers co-authored together Giulia Conte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201892
2 202064
3 201334
4 201231
5 198829
6 202026
7 202022
8 202016
9 199015
10 201715
11 202115
12 201814
13 202412
14 201311
15 202111
16 202211
17
Changes of bioelectrical impedance after a body weight reduction program in highly obese subjects.
200010
18 20229
19 19957
20
Acute cardiovascular diseases and respiratory sleep disorders.
19997

About Giulia Conte

Giulia Conte is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 35 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (10 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (23 citations), Clinical Psychology (175 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (127 citations), Internal Medicine (18 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (69 citations). Giulia Conte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Cardona, Francesca Valente, Ádám Takács, Tobias Bäumer, Christian Beste, Alexander Münchau, Julius Verrel, Federica Del Chierico, Gianluca Ianiro and Alessandra Russo. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Cephalalgia and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact