Giulia Conte

33 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Giulia Conte
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Clinical Psychology 187
  • Biological Psychiatry 17
  • Internal Medicine 18
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 110
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 76
Replace Cong Zhou with:
Cong Zhou China
Núria Pujol Spain
Audrey S. Chang United States
Sandrine Sonié France
Wei Qi China
Mohsin Maqbool United States
Jianbai Liu China
Heinz‐Gerd Weijers Germany
Guohua Xia United States
Kathelijne M. Koorengevel Netherlands
Giulia Conte relative to Cong Zhou China Cong Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Cong Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giulia Conte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giulia Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giulia Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giulia Conte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giulia Conte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giulia Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giulia Conte. The network helps show where Giulia Conte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giulia Conte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giulia Conte Line = papers co-authored together Giulia Conte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201898
2 202068
3 201339
4 201235
5 198832
6 202029
7 202026
8 202118
9 202018
10 202417
11 199017
12 201817
13 201716
14 202212
15 202112
16 202211
17 201311
18
Changes of bioelectrical impedance after a body weight reduction program in highly obese subjects.
200010
19 19958
20
Acute cardiovascular diseases and respiratory sleep disorders.
19997

About Giulia Conte

Giulia Conte is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (11 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (187 citations), Biological Psychiatry (17 citations), Internal Medicine (18 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (76 citations). Giulia Conte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Cardona, Francesca Valente, Alexander Münchau, Tobias Bäumer, Julius Verrel, Christian Beste, Ádám Takács, Alessandra Russo, Antonio Gasbarrini and Bruno Dallapiccola. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Hormone and Metabolic Research, NeuroImage Clinical, Sleep And Breathing and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact