R. Prohens

690 citations
39 papers · 537 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

R. Prohens

39 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

R. Prohens
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Geometry and Topology 488
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 319
  • Mathematical Physics 51
  • Applied Mathematics 58
  • Biochemistry 28
Replace Douglas S. Shafer with:
Douglas S. Shafer United States
Claudio A. Buzzi Brazil
Jiazhong Yang China
Jordi Villadelprat Spain
Joan C. Artés Spain
Iliya D. Iliev Bulgaria
João C. Medrado Brazil
Terence R. Blows United States
Xianbo Sun China
R. Prohens relative to Douglas S. Shafer United States Douglas S. Shafer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Douglas S. Shafer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Prohens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Prohens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Prohens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Prohens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Prohens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Prohens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Prohens. The network helps show where R. Prohens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside R. Prohens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Prohens Line = papers co-authored together R. Prohens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001124
2 199741
3 200539
4 200930
5 199925
6 201824
7 201524
8 200820
9 201120
10 201318
11 199616
12 200016
13 201714
14 201212
15 201910
16 20139
17 20129
18 20109
19 20089
20 20198

About R. Prohens

R. Prohens is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (31 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (21 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (7 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (5 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (5 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (4 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (488 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (319 citations), Mathematical Physics (51 citations), Applied Mathematics (58 citations) and Biochemistry (28 citations). R. Prohens has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include Armengol Gasull, B. Coll, Joan Torregrosa, Antonio E. Teruel, M.J. Álvarez, Chengzhi Li, Freddy Dumortier, Jaume Llibre, José Luis Bravo and Peter De Maesschalck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Journal of Differential Equations, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, Nonlinear Analysis and Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact