R. Mitchell

27 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

R. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Nephrology 73
  • Transplantation 27
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 33
  • Surgery 235
  • Rheumatology 74
Replace Patrick Ergina with:
Patrick Ergina Canada
Joan Beltrán Spain
Dan Schuller United States
Ashar Ata United States
Chyng‐Wen Fwu United States
Purvi P. Patel United States
F.A. Spencer Canada
Matthew Slater United States
Abdul Hakeem United Kingdom
David M. Axelrod United States
R. Mitchell relative to Patrick Ergina Canada Patrick Ergina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.4×
Patrick Ergina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Mitchell. The network helps show where R. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together R. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013120
2 201186
3 201172
4 199868
5 200061
6 201157
7 199943
8 200038
9 199833
10 200031
11 201021
12 199519
13 199110
14 197410
15 19899
16 20097
17 20095
18 20043
19 20033
20 20113

About R. Mitchell

R. Mitchell is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 708 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (3 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (73 citations), Transplantation (27 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (33 citations), Surgery (235 citations) and Rheumatology (74 citations). R. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. Saifuddin, Sarah J. D. Burnett, Jonathan C. Craig, J. Pringle, Angela C Webster, A. Sandison, D. Remedios, Rebecca Beynon, Steve McDonald and Penny Whiting. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Clinical Radiology, Nephrology and Orthopedics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact