R. H. Wright

431 citations
14 papers · 369 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

R. H. Wright

13 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

R. H. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Immunology and Allergy 142
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 97
  • Sensory Systems 32
  • Physiology 88
  • Dermatology 25
Replace A Scordamaglia with:
A Scordamaglia Italy
Mirjana Turkalj Croatia
L Businco Italy
R. S. B. Pearson United Kingdom
Paul M. Seebohm United States
Thomas Frödin Sweden
Amanda Rodríguez‐Urrutia Spain
Douglas P. Mack Canada
Earle B. Weiss United States
Karin Due Bruun Denmark
R. H. Wright relative to A Scordamaglia Italy A Scordamaglia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
A Scordamaglia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. H. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. H. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. H. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. H. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. H. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. H. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. H. Wright. The network helps show where R. H. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside R. H. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. H. Wright Line = papers co-authored together R. H. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1988109
2 198575
3 198775
4 198523
5 198922
6 198814
7 198212
8 198712
9
Immunofluorescent antibodies in patients with bird-fancier's lung.
19788
10 19878
11 19855
12 19853
13 19892
14 19801

About R. H. Wright

R. H. Wright is a scholar working on Immunology, Immunology and Allergy, Pharmacology, Dermatology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mast cells and histamine (4 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (3 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (2 papers), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (2 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (1 paper) and Fatigue and fracture mechanics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (142 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (97 citations), Sensory Systems (32 citations), Physiology (88 citations) and Dermatology (25 citations). R. H. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Duncan A. Robertson, Michael Kaliner, Janet K. Dale, Stephen E. Straus, Howard M. Druce, David Kossoff, Dean D. Metcalfe, William J. Meggs, C. Smith and Robert B. Bressler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, International Journal of Fatigue, Canadian Journal of Zoology, Journal of Investigative Dermatology and IEEE Power Engineering Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact