R. Canella

1.5k citations
16 papers · 1.3k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

R. Canella

15 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

R. Canella
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Developmental Neuroscience 184
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 570
  • Ophthalmology 215
  • Pharmacology 249
  • Neurology 113
Replace Chiara Simone with:
Chiara Simone Italy
Jinbo Deng China
Agata Góźdź Poland
Daniel A. Ryskamp United States
Yoshio Akagi Japan
Paulo F. Santos Portugal
Torsten Falk United States
Covadonga Pañeda Spain
Gabriele Ugolini Italy
Yanying Miao China
R. Canella relative to Chiara Simone Italy Chiara Simone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Chiara Simone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Canella

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Canella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Canella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Canella more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Canella

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Canella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Canella. The network helps show where R. Canella may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Canella, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Canella Line = papers co-authored together R. Canella links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1996288
2 1992260
3 1989228
4
Nerve growth factor promotes functional recovery of retinal ganglion cells after ischemia.
1993102
5 198490
6 199387
7 199378
8
Flash and pattern electroretinograms during and after acute intraocular pressure elevation in cats.
198870
9 198242
10 199235
11 198118
12 19837
13 19846
14 19835
15 19881
16 19950

About R. Canella

R. Canella is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Neurology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (2 papers), Mast cells and histamine (2 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Liver physiology and pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (184 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (570 citations), Ophthalmology (215 citations), Pharmacology (249 citations) and Neurology (113 citations). R. Canella has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Giorgio Carmignoto, Renata Siliprandi, R. Zanoni, L. Maffei, P Candeo, Lucía Petrelli, Gabriele Marcolongo, Alberta Leon, S. Mazzari and Anna Zanellato. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Neuropathologica, Neuroreport, Neuroscience, The Journal of Physiology and Pharmacological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact