Procter Thomson
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Economic Growth and Productivity
-
- Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Papers in
-
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 3
- Legal and Constitutional Studies 1
- Fiscal Policies and Political Economy 1
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 1
- Co-authors
- Theodore W. Schultz (1 shared paper)George C. S. Benson (2 shared papers)Henry N. Goldstein (1 shared paper)Seymour E. Harris (1 shared paper)William S. Stokes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Higher Education (2 papers)Economic Inquiry (1 paper)Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society (1 paper)The School Review (1 paper)The Western Political Quarterly (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Procter Thomson
6 papers receiving 189 citations
Procter Thomson's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Economics and Econometrics 102
- Safety Research 20
- Education 59
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 3
- Political Science and International Relations 45
Countries citing papers authored by Procter Thomson
This map shows the geographic impact of Procter Thomson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Procter Thomson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Procter Thomson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Procter Thomson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Procter Thomson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Procter Thomson. The network helps show where Procter Thomson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Procter Thomson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Economic Value of Education Hit paper breakdown → | 1964 | 211 |
| 2 | 1967 | 7 | |
| 3 | 1960 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1971 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1953 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1962 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1952 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1952 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1952 | 0 |
About Procter Thomson
Procter Thomson is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Accounting, Demography and Education, having authored 11 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (1 paper), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (1 paper), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (1 paper), School Choice and Performance (1 paper), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper) and Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (102 citations), Safety Research (20 citations), Education (59 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (3 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (45 citations). Procter Thomson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Theodore W. Schultz, George C. S. Benson, Henry N. Goldstein, Seymour E. Harris and William S. Stokes. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Higher Education, Economic Inquiry, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, The School Review and The Western Political Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.