P.L. Schiff
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Berberine and alkaloids research
- Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Papers in
-
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 15
- Biochemistry 17
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 17
- Co-authors
- David J. Slatkin (35 shared papers)Joseph E. Knapp (28 shared papers)D. Dwuma-Badu (16 shared papers)Albert N. Tackie (16 shared papers)A. B. Ray (5 shared papers)Michael A. Zemaitis (3 shared papers)J.L. Beal (2 shared papers)Raymond W. Doskotch (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Natural Products (15 papers)Phytochemistry (12 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (7 papers)Tetrahedron (2 papers)Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGhanaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
P.L. Schiff
53 papers receiving 696 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Biochemistry 151
- Pharmacology 172
- Horticulture 14
- Pharmacology 182
- Biochemistry 44
Countries citing papers authored by P.L. Schiff
This map shows the geographic impact of P.L. Schiff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.L. Schiff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.L. Schiff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P.L. Schiff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.L. Schiff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.L. Schiff. The network helps show where P.L. Schiff may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside P.L. Schiff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 63 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 58 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 51 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 50 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 44 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 35 | |
| 7 | 1969 | 35 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 29 | |
| 9 | 1975 | 29 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 22 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1977 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 13 |
About P.L. Schiff
P.L. Schiff is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Pharmacology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (17 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (15 papers), Berberine and alkaloids research (11 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (9 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (8 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (4 papers), Synthesis and bioactivity of alkaloids (4 papers) and Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (151 citations), Pharmacology (172 citations), Horticulture (14 citations), Pharmacology (182 citations) and Biochemistry (44 citations). P.L. Schiff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David J. Slatkin, Joseph E. Knapp, D. Dwuma-Badu, Albert N. Tackie, A. B. Ray, Michael A. Zemaitis, J.L. Beal, Raymond W. Doskotch, Shyamal Kumar Chattopadhyay and Rakesh Maurya. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Phytochemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tetrahedron and Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.