P.J. Carleton
Impact in
-
- MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
-
- MRI in cancer diagnosis 8
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 4
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 2
- Co-authors
- John Fox (9 shared papers)Michael J. Kerin (6 shared papers)Lindsay W. Turnbull (7 shared papers)David S. Walton (2 shared papers)Valerie Speirs (2 shared papers)Stephen L. Atkin (2 shared papers)S. Mussurakis (5 shared papers)Philip Drew (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Radiology (2 papers)British Journal of Radiology (2 papers)Annals of Surgical Oncology (2 papers)Acta Radiologica (2 papers)Investigative Radiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
P.J. Carleton
13 papers receiving 705 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 303
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 166
- Cancer Research 132
- Genetics 203
- Oncology 153
Countries citing papers authored by P.J. Carleton
This map shows the geographic impact of P.J. Carleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.J. Carleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.J. Carleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P.J. Carleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.J. Carleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.J. Carleton. The network helps show where P.J. Carleton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside P.J. Carleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coexpression of estrogen receptor alpha and beta: poor prognostic factors in human breast cancer? | 1999 | 202 |
| 2 | 1999 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 83 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 65 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 59 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 54 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 54 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 32 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 3 |
About P.J. Carleton
P.J. Carleton is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Dermatology and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 726 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include MRI in cancer diagnosis (8 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (1 paper), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (303 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (166 citations), Cancer Research (132 citations), Genetics (203 citations) and Oncology (153 citations). P.J. Carleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Fox, Michael J. Kerin, Lindsay W. Turnbull, David S. Walton, Valerie Speirs, Stephen L. Atkin, S. Mussurakis, Philip Drew, Alicia Parkes and John R.T. Monson. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Radiology, British Journal of Radiology, Annals of Surgical Oncology, Acta Radiologica and Investigative Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.