Philip Drew

2.8k citations
74 papers · 2.2k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 4
    • Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications 4
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 5

Philip Drew

71 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Philip Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Cancer Research 354
  • Occupational Therapy 97
  • Rehabilitation 136
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 315
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 206
Replace Marguerite Ennis with:
Marguerite Ennis Canada
Maria Fiammetta Romano Italy
Jyotirmoy Chatterjee India
Scott A. Berceli United States
Sanjay Patel Australia
William D. Wallace United States
Ying Zhuge United States
Jongphil Kim United States
Wan Zhu China
Francesco Pesce Italy
Philip Drew relative to Marguerite Ennis Canada Marguerite Ennis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Marguerite Ennis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Drew. The network helps show where Philip Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Drew Line = papers co-authored together Philip Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006196
2 1997183
3 2007160
4 1997131
5 199998
6 200773
7 200072
8 200066
9 199765
10 199854
11 200751
12 199550
13 200947
14 199846
15 201145
16 199642
17 201439
18 200136
19 201234
20 201032

About Philip Drew

Philip Drew is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 74 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (4 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (4 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (4 papers) and Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (354 citations), Occupational Therapy (97 citations), Rehabilitation (136 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (315 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (206 citations). Philip Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include John R.T. Monson, Lynn Cawkwell, Michael Lind, Laura Smith, Leonardo Bottaci, Graeme S. Duthie, Mark B. Watson, John Fox, Michael J. Kerin and Lindsay W. Turnbull. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast, British journal of surgery, International Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Surgical Oncology and Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact