Philip Drew

2.8k citations
69 papers · 2.1k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 4
    • Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications 4
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 5

Philip Drew

69 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Philip Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Cancer Research 340
  • Occupational Therapy 96
  • Rehabilitation 129
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 290
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 198
Replace James Malone with:
James Malone United States
Marguerite Ennis Canada
Maria Fiammetta Romano Italy
Sanjiv Jain India
Chun Chen China
Takumi Yamamoto Japan
Zhenlong Chen China
Gang Zhou China
Jongphil Kim United States
William D. Wallace United States
Philip Drew relative to James Malone United States James Malone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
James Malone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Drew. The network helps show where Philip Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Drew Line = papers co-authored together Philip Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006192
2 1997165
3 2007153
4 1997125
5 199993
6 200771
7 200070
8 200064
9 199764
10 200750
11 199549
12 199848
13 199846
14 200944
15 201143
16 199640
17 201438
18 201233
19 200132
20
n-Butyl cyanoacrylate adhesive for skin closure of abdominal wounds: preliminary results.
199731

About Philip Drew

Philip Drew is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (4 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (4 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (4 papers) and Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (340 citations), Occupational Therapy (96 citations), Rehabilitation (129 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (290 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (198 citations). Philip Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include John R.T. Monson, Lynn Cawkwell, Michael Lind, Laura Smith, Graeme S. Duthie, Mark B. Watson, Leonardo Bottaci, John Fox, Michael J. Kerin and Lindsay W. Turnbull. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, International Journal of Cancer, Journal of Proteomics and Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact