Pippa Bark

934 citations
15 papers · 529 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Pippa Bark

14 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Pippa Bark
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Health Information Management 221
  • Pharmacy 79
  • Medical Terminology 4
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Emergency Medical Services 60
Replace Sharona Hoffman with:
Sharona Hoffman United States
Jukka Vänskä Finland
Sue S. Feldman United States
Mehrdad Farzandipour Iran
Ben-Tzion Karsh United States
Pedro J. Hernández Spain
Shirly Bar‐Lev Israel
Mitchell A. Medow United States
Johanna Lammintakanen Finland
P. Zoē Stavri United States
Pippa Bark relative to Sharona Hoffman United States Sharona Hoffman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Sharona Hoffman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pippa Bark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pippa Bark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pippa Bark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pippa Bark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pippa Bark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pippa Bark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pippa Bark. The network helps show where Pippa Bark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pippa Bark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pippa Bark Line = papers co-authored together Pippa Bark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2009335
2 199448
3 201946
4 201932
5 199725
6 199413
7
Towards a better understanding of delivering e-health systems: a systematic review using the meta-narrative method and two case studies
201112
8 20055
9 19974
10 20233
11 20243
12 19861
13 20121
14
A systematic review of electronic patient records using the meta-narrative approach: Empirical findings and methodological challenges.
20081
15 20250

About Pippa Bark

Pippa Bark is a scholar working on Health Information Management, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (3 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper) and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (221 citations), Pharmacy (79 citations), Medical Terminology (4 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (60 citations). Pippa Bark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Henry Potts, Geoff Wong, Trisha Greenhalgh, Deborah Swinglehurst, Charles Vincent, Angela Jones, J. G. Savory, Clive Bowman, Tim Benson and Jonathan Kay. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR Mental Health, BMJ Open, Early Child Development and Care, Journal of Nursing Regulation and Open Heart.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact