Pip Griffiths

10 papers receiving 460 citations

Pip Griffiths's Hit Papers

Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures 2021 · 316 citations
3160+1+3Years since publication100200300

Peers

Pip Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Applied Psychology 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 32
  • Social Psychology 50
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 26
  • Clinical Psychology 38
Replace SJ Cano with:
SJ Cano United Kingdom
Catherine Doyle Canada
Amy B. Sullivan United States
Ingrid Lekander Sweden
Julie Jiang United States
Ellen B. M. Elsman Netherlands
John C. Friel United States
Aylin Rezvanı Türkiye
Dale Sherman United States
Derya İren Akbıyık Türkiye
Pip Griffiths relative to SJ Cano United Kingdom SJ Cano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
SJ Cano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pip Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pip Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pip Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pip Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pip Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pip Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pip Griffiths. The network helps show where Pip Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pip Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pip Griffiths Line = papers co-authored together Pip Griffiths links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures
Hit paper breakdown →
2021316
2 201681
3 202129
4 202212
5 20238
6 20237
7 20234
8 20233
9 20223
10 20221

About Pip Griffiths

Pip Griffiths is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (12 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (32 citations), Social Psychology (50 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (26 citations) and Clinical Psychology (38 citations). Pip Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Berend Terluin, Caroline B. Terwee, Robert S. Chapman, Jin‐Shei Lai, David Cella, John Devin Peipert, Lidwine B. Mokkink, Jakob Bue Bjørner, Andrew Trigg and Sara D. Hodges. Their work appears in journals such as Quality of Life Research, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, RMD Open, JAMA Network Open and Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact