Pip Griffiths
Impact in
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 2
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
-
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing 3
- Co-authors
- Berend Terluin (4 shared papers)Caroline B. Terwee (2 shared papers)Robert S. Chapman (1 shared paper)Jin‐Shei Lai (1 shared paper)John Devin Peipert (1 shared paper)Lidwine B. Mokkink (1 shared paper)David Cella (1 shared paper)Jakob Bue Bjørner (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Quality of Life Research (3 papers)JAMA Network Open (1 paper)Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (1 paper)Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Pip Griffiths
10 papers receiving 415 citations
Pip Griffiths's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Psychiatry and Mental health 50
- Pharmacology 49
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
- Applied Psychology 14
- Social Psychology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Pip Griffiths
This map shows the geographic impact of Pip Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pip Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pip Griffiths more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pip Griffiths
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pip Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pip Griffiths. The network helps show where Pip Griffiths may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pip Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 283 |
| 2 | 2016 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 1 |
About Pip Griffiths
Pip Griffiths is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Applied Psychology and Surgery, having authored 10 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (50 citations), Pharmacology (49 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (37 citations), Applied Psychology (14 citations) and Social Psychology (54 citations). Pip Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Berend Terluin, Caroline B. Terwee, Robert S. Chapman, Jin‐Shei Lai, John Devin Peipert, Lidwine B. Mokkink, David Cella, Jakob Bue Bjørner, Andrew Trigg and Marianne Schmid Mast. Their work appears in journals such as Quality of Life Research, JAMA Network Open, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.