Ping‐Ting Lin

1.9k citations
54 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Ping‐Ting Lin

53 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ping‐Ting Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Biochemistry 137
  • Orthodontics 72
  • Clinical Biochemistry 106
  • Biochemistry 71
  • General Dentistry 18
Replace Hamit Hakan with:
Hamit Hakan Türkiye
Joanna Szczepańska Poland
Franco Cervellati Italy
Serap Arbak Türkiye
Danuta Waszkiel Poland
Małgorzata Knaś Poland
Sachiko Nomura Japan
Serdar Öztürk Türkiye
Vesna Vučić Serbia
Ruiyue Yang China
Ping‐Ting Lin relative to Hamit Hakan Türkiye Hamit Hakan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Hamit Hakan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐Ting Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐Ting Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐Ting Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐Ting Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping‐Ting Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐Ting Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐Ting Lin. The network helps show where Ping‐Ting Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping‐Ting Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping‐Ting Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ping‐Ting Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013140
2 2011126
3 2012116
4 2014100
5 201279
6 201573
7 201469
8 201762
9 201255
10 201653
11 201839
12 201636
13 200633
14 200333
15 201632
16 201729
17 201629
18 200825
19
Effects of dietary supplementation of Moringa oleifera on growth performance, blood characteristics and immune response in broilers
200723
20 201623

About Ping‐Ting Lin

Ping‐Ting Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Orthodontics, Rheumatology, Physiology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects (16 papers), Dental materials and restorations (8 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (5 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (5 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (5 papers), Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments (4 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (137 citations), Orthodontics (72 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (106 citations), Biochemistry (71 citations) and General Dentistry (18 citations). Ping‐Ting Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bor‐Jen Lee, Yi‐Chia Huang, Chi‐Hua Yen, Shu‐Ju Chen, Yi‐Chin Lin, Simon Hsia, Shao‐Bin Cheng, Yung‐Po Liaw, Yu Fan and Jihua Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrition, Nutrients, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE and Antioxidants.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact