Ping‐Hui Gao

31 papers receiving 933 citations

Peers

Ping‐Hui Gao
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Infectious Diseases 491
  • Molecular Medicine 57
  • Pharmacology 161
  • Toxicology 30
  • Epidemiology 236
Replace Juan Guzman with:
Juan Guzman United Kingdom
Lan Yan China
Antima Gupta India
Anne‐Marie Alarco Canada
Regiane Bertin de Lima Scodro Brazil
Yongmoon Han South Korea
Fabrice Pagniez France
Jin‐Hwan Kwak South Korea
Nitin Pal Kalia India
Sara H. Mahmoud Egypt
Ping‐Hui Gao relative to Juan Guzman United Kingdom Juan Guzman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Juan Guzman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐Hui Gao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐Hui Gao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐Hui Gao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐Hui Gao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping‐Hui Gao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐Hui Gao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐Hui Gao. The network helps show where Ping‐Hui Gao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping‐Hui Gao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping‐Hui Gao Line = papers co-authored together Ping‐Hui Gao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006136
2 2005119
3 200998
4 200598
5 200887
6 200879
7 200549
8
Baicalein induces programmed cell death in Candida albicans.
200944
9 200738
10 200827
11 200824
12 200919
13 200717
14 200916
15 200614
16 201412
17 201611
18 200710
19 20109
20 20079

About Ping‐Hui Gao

Ping‐Hui Gao is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Immunology and Food Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 968 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (25 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (9 papers), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (4 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (3 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (3 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (2 papers) and Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (491 citations), Molecular Medicine (57 citations), Pharmacology (161 citations), Toxicology (30 citations) and Epidemiology (236 citations). Ping‐Hui Gao has collaborated with scholars based in China, Philippines and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yuanying Jiang, Yan Wang, Yongbing Cao, Zheng Xu, Baodi Dai, Lan Yan, Jundong Zhang, Xin‐Ming Jia, Yingying Cao and Yingying Cao. Their work appears in journals such as Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal of Ethnopharmacology and Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact