Ping Yao

1.3k citations
42 papers · 1.0k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Yao

42 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Ping Yao
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 213
  • Food Science 295
  • Pharmacology 85
  • Neurology 75
  • Biochemistry 49
Replace Kumar Sapkota with:
Kumar Sapkota South Korea
Fareeha Anwar Pakistan
Ho‐Young Choi South Korea
M. Saeed Siddiqui India
Yongjie Li China
Anna Fiedorowicz Poland
Lirong Teng China
Pengyi Hu China
Wanyi Li China
Jae Soon Eun South Korea
Ping Yao relative to Kumar Sapkota South Korea Kumar Sapkota's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Kumar Sapkota · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Yao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Yao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Yao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Yao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Yao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Yao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Yao. The network helps show where Ping Yao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Yao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Yao Line = papers co-authored together Ping Yao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201393
2 201793
3 202054
4 201852
5 201446
6 201746
7 201444
8 201641
9 201737
10 201836
11 201936
12 201630
13 201729
14 201428
15 201427
16 201527
17 201427
18 201422
19 201822
20 201322

About Ping Yao

Ping Yao is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Food Science, Neurology and Plant Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ziziphus Jujuba Studies and Applications (7 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (6 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (5 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers) and Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (213 citations), Food Science (295 citations), Pharmacology (85 citations), Neurology (75 citations) and Biochemistry (49 citations). Ping Yao has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karl Wah Keung Tsim, Tina T. X. Dong, Jianping Chen, Tina Ting-Xia Dong, Kelly Y. C. Lam, Huai‐You Wang, Candy T. W. Lam, Jian-Shu Lou, Li Zhang and Zhong‐Yu Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Phytotherapy Research, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Phytomedicine, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact