Ping Yan

803 citations
37 papers · 627 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Yan

36 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Ping Yan
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Cancer Research 71
  • Genetics 40
  • Molecular Biology 212
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 52
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 10
Replace Juryun Kim with:
Juryun Kim South Korea
Juan Yang China
Hwanhee Oh South Korea
Katherine Huang United States
Guillermo Turiel Switzerland
Guoli Hu United States
Cong Qiu China
Alicia Usategui Spain
Gordana Šupić Serbia
Jiajia Lu China
Ping Yan relative to Juryun Kim South Korea Juryun Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Juryun Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Yan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Yan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Yan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Yan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Yan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Yan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Yan. The network helps show where Ping Yan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Yan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Yan Line = papers co-authored together Ping Yan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201993
2 201349
3 201835
4 201633
5
TWEAK protects cardiomyocyte against apoptosis in a PI3K/AKT pathway dependent manner.
201629
6 202029
7 201627
8 201526
9 201824
10 201824
11 202124
12 201923
13 201821
14 202121
15 200820
16 202420
17 201815
18 201314
19 201513
20 202113

About Ping Yan

Ping Yan is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Genetics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (3 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (2 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (71 citations), Genetics (40 citations), Molecular Biology (212 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (52 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (10 citations). Ping Yan has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jun Xie, Enxing Xue, Yulong Zhou, Xiaoyun Pan, Linlin Huang, Fangfang Wu, Zucheng Luo, Ren‐Ke Li, Rui Guo and Jun Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Letters, Rejuvenation Research, Scientia Horticulturae, Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters and Cell Death and Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact