Ping Wan
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
- Food Science top 10%
- Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Proteins in Food Systems
Papers in
- Food Science 10
- Food and Agricultural Sciences 4
- Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety 3
- Food Drying and Modeling 2
-
- Edible Oils Quality and Analysis 13
- Co-authors
- R. J. Hron (8 shared papers)E. J. Conkerton (6 shared papers)M. S. Kuk (6 shared papers)Mediha Yildirim‐Aksoy (2 shared papers)P.H. Klesius (2 shared papers)C. Lim (2 shared papers)Michael K. Dowd (2 shared papers)Dorselyn C. Chapital (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society (17 papers)Journal of Food Science (5 papers)Aquaculture Nutrition (1 paper)Weed Technology (1 paper)Journal of Applied Microbiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Ping Wan
26 papers receiving 353 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Organic Chemistry 148
- Food Science 61
- Aquatic Science 18
- Animal Science and Zoology 22
- Mechanical Engineering 58
Countries citing papers authored by Ping Wan
This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Wan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Wan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Wan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Wan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Wan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Wan. The network helps show where Ping Wan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ping Wan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 49 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 36 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1977 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 5 |
About Ping Wan
Ping Wan is a scholar working on Food Science, Organic Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Plant Science and Pollution, having authored 27 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (13 papers), Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization (9 papers), Food and Agricultural Sciences (4 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (4 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (3 papers), Food Drying and Modeling (2 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (2 papers) and Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (148 citations), Food Science (61 citations), Aquatic Science (18 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (22 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (58 citations). Ping Wan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Hron, E. J. Conkerton, M. S. Kuk, Mediha Yildirim‐Aksoy, P.H. Klesius, C. Lim, Michael K. Dowd, Dorselyn C. Chapital, Phillip J. Wakelyn and Craig A. Shoemaker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Journal of Food Science, Aquaculture Nutrition, Weed Technology and Journal of Applied Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.