Pierre Livet

606 citations
43 papers · 256 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Pierre Livet

35 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

Pierre Livet
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • General Decision Sciences 8
  • Sociology and Political Science 123
  • Philosophy 30
  • Urban Studies 15
  • General Psychology 3
Replace M.J.W. Stokmans with:
M.J.W. Stokmans Netherlands
David Peterson United States
John A. Smith United States
Bernd Lahno Germany
Antoine Bousquet United Kingdom
Cornelia Brantner Germany
Alfred F. MacKay United States
Daniel Rigney United States
Hossam Zeitoun United Kingdom
Otto Neurath
Pierre Livet relative to M.J.W. Stokmans Netherlands M.J.W. Stokmans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
M.J.W. Stokmans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pierre Livet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pierre Livet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierre Livet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierre Livet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pierre Livet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierre Livet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierre Livet. The network helps show where Pierre Livet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Pierre Livet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pierre Livet Line = papers co-authored together Pierre Livet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200293
2 200934
3 201027
4 200922
5 201612
6 200610
7 20127
8 20086
9 20125
10 20144
11
Les Limites de la rationalité
19972
12
Leçons de Philosophie Économique
20052
13
Towards an Epistemology of Multi-agent Simulation in Social Sciences.
20072
14 20032
15 20092
16 19932
17 20082
18
Ontology, a mediator for Agent-Based Modeling.
20091
19
Un plaidoyer pour les mécanismes
20031
20 20141

About Pierre Livet

Pierre Livet is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Urban Studies, Strategy and Management and Social Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Urban and Social Studies (11 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (6 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (6 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (6 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers) and Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (8 citations), Sociology and Political Science (123 citations), Philosophy (30 citations), Urban Studies (15 citations) and General Psychology (3 citations). Pierre Livet has collaborated with scholars based in France, Zambia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alan Kirman, Miriam Teschl, Léna Sanders, Denis Phan∥, Jean‐Pierre Müller, Alain Leroux, Bénédicte Reynaud, Jon Elster and Roberto Casati. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Emotion Review, Metaphilosophy and Journal of Economic Methodology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact