Daniel Rigney
Impact in
-
- Social Media and Politics
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Religion and Society Interactions
Papers in
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 4
- Emile Durkheim and Sociology 1
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 1
- Religion, Society, and Development 1
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 1
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 1
- Co-authors
- Richard A. Hilbert (1 shared paper)Colin Cherry (1 shared paper)Thomas J. Hoffman (1 shared paper)Richard S. Machalek (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (3 papers)Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (2 papers)Sociological Inquiry (1 paper)Social Science Quarterly (1 paper)Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Rigney
11 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Communication 31
- Sociology and Political Science 141
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 17
- Political Science and International Relations 58
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 29
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Rigney
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Rigney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Rigney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Rigney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Rigney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Rigney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Rigney. The network helps show where Daniel Rigney may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Rigney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage | 2010 | 140 |
| 2 | 1991 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 45 | |
| 4 | Patterns of Interdisciplinary Citation in the Social Sciences. | 1980 | 30 |
| 5 | 1983 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1980 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1979 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1978 | 2 | |
| 12 | ANALOGIES IN SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY | 1982 | 1 |
About Daniel Rigney
Daniel Rigney is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Information Systems and Management, Health and Insect Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Emile Durkheim and Sociology (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper), Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper) and Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (31 citations), Sociology and Political Science (141 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (17 citations), Political Science and International Relations (58 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (29 citations). Daniel Rigney has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Hilbert, Colin Cherry, Thomas J. Hoffman and Richard S. Machalek. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Sociological Inquiry, Social Science Quarterly and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.