Pierre Liénard

1.5k citations
32 papers · 718 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Pierre Liénard

31 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

Pierre Liénard
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Health 99
  • Social Psychology 250
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 146
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 189
  • Archeology 9
Replace Catharine Cross with:
Catharine Cross United Kingdom
E. Thomas Lawson United States
Armin W. Geertz Denmark
Rita Astuti United Kingdom
Jonathan A. Lanman United Kingdom
Panagiotis Mitkidis Denmark
Paul Reddish Czechia
Ilkka Pyysiäinen Finland
John H. Shaver New Zealand
Candace S. Alcorta United States
Pierre Liénard relative to Catharine Cross United Kingdom Catharine Cross's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Catharine Cross · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pierre Liénard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pierre Liénard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierre Liénard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierre Liénard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pierre Liénard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierre Liénard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierre Liénard. The network helps show where Pierre Liénard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Pierre Liénard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pierre Liénard Line = papers co-authored together Pierre Liénard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006310
2 2006123
3 200844
4 200641
5 201024
6 202022
7 201319
8 200816
9 201316
10 201213
11 201211
12 200610
13 201210
14 20069
15 20178
16 20168
17 20146
18 20184
19
Tools for thought: the ritual use of ordinary tools
20134
20 20193

About Pierre Liénard

Pierre Liénard is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cultural Studies, having authored 32 papers that have together received 718 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (12 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (11 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Language and cultural evolution (4 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (4 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (4 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (99 citations), Social Psychology (250 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (146 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (189 citations) and Archeology (9 citations). Pierre Liénard has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Pascal Boyer, Jesper Sørensen, E. Thomas Lawson, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Kristoffer Laigaard Nielbo, Daniel C. Benyshek, Marc Malmdorf Andersen, Sharon M. Young, Jing Xu and Coralie Chevallier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cognition and Culture, PLoS ONE, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Religion and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact