Phyllis Bobak

894 citations
17 papers · 619 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Phyllis Bobak

17 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers

Phyllis Bobak
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Ophthalmology 126
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 267
  • Neurology 135
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 112
  • Neurology 29
Replace L. Mylin with:
L. Mylin United States
Jeremy Z. Kieval United States
Siobhan Garbutt United States
T. Fitzgibbon Australia
A. Glover United States
C. Kennard United Kingdom
Sofya Glazman United States
Matthias Korth Germany
Anne‐Isabelle Vermersch France
Harriet R. Friedman United States
Phyllis Bobak relative to L. Mylin United States L. Mylin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
L. Mylin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phyllis Bobak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phyllis Bobak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phyllis Bobak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phyllis Bobak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phyllis Bobak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phyllis Bobak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phyllis Bobak. The network helps show where Phyllis Bobak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Phyllis Bobak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phyllis Bobak Line = papers co-authored together Phyllis Bobak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1987232
2 1983103
3 198752
4 198641
5
VEPs in humans reveal high and low spatial contrast mechanisms.
198440
6 199131
7 198821
8 199420
9 198819
10
On the possible role of temporal delays of afferent processing in Parkinson's disease.
198318
11 199315
12 198214
13 19935
14
The pattern visual evoked potential. A multicenter study using standardized techniques
19953
15 19873
16 19891
17 19881

About Phyllis Bobak

Phyllis Bobak is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Color Science and Applications (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (126 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (267 citations), Neurology (135 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (112 citations) and Neurology (29 citations). Phyllis Bobak has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Iván Bódis-Wollner, L. Mylin, Melvin D. Yahr, Marcia S. Marx, Sunanda Mitra, C. Harnois, J. Thornton, S. M. Podos, L. Maffei and Mitchell Brigell. Their work appears in journals such as Documenta Ophthalmologica, Current Eye Research, Optometry and Vision Science, The Journal of Physiology and Brain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact