Phoon Ping Chen

12 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Phoon Ping Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 56
  • Family Practice 20
  • Pharmacology 80
  • Physiology 115
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 95
Replace Emma Briggs with:
Emma Briggs United Kingdom
Alexis Cournoyer Canada
Susanne Molin Friis Denmark
Katherine A. Pohlman United States
Jacqueline Ellis Canada
Alessandra N. Garcia United States
Carl D. Stevens United States
Kathleen Duncan United States
Kathryn Dickinson United States
Nicholas A. Giordano United States
Phoon Ping Chen relative to Emma Briggs United Kingdom Emma Briggs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Emma Briggs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phoon Ping Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phoon Ping Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoon Ping Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoon Ping Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phoon Ping Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoon Ping Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoon Ping Chen. The network helps show where Phoon Ping Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Phoon Ping Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phoon Ping Chen Line = papers co-authored together Phoon Ping Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2019178
2 201853
3 201036
4 200127
5 201616
6 201915
7 201710
8 202110
9 20197
10 20224
11 19963
12 20203

About Phoon Ping Chen

Phoon Ping Chen is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (56 citations), Family Practice (20 citations), Pharmacology (80 citations), Physiology (115 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (95 citations). Phoon Ping Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hing‐yu So, George Kwok Chu Wong, Tony Gin, Jenny S. W. Lee, Sheung‐Tak Cheng, Yu Fat Chow, Cindy W. C. Tam, Edward Leung, Joanne W. Y. Chung and Po Tong Chui. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Aging & Mental Health, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and International Psychogeriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact