Phing‐How Lou

24 papers receiving 639 citations

Peers

Phing‐How Lou
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Developmental Neuroscience 81
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 102
  • Cell Biology 96
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 84
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 37
Replace Alison Thomas with:
Alison Thomas United Kingdom
Vincent Vagni United States
Yu Okuma Japan
Chaoying Yan China
Norma Alva Spain
Rivaze Kalaycı Türkiye
Louise E. See Hoe Australia
Huirong Han China
Phing‐How Lou relative to Alison Thomas United Kingdom Alison Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Alison Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phing‐How Lou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phing‐How Lou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phing‐How Lou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phing‐How Lou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phing‐How Lou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phing‐How Lou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phing‐How Lou. The network helps show where Phing‐How Lou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phing‐How Lou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phing‐How Lou Line = papers co-authored together Phing‐How Lou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012122
2 2016114
3 201444
4 201042
5 201442
6 202040
7 202131
8 201729
9 201223
10 202018
11 201216
12 201716
13 202214
14 201713
15 201413
16 201112
17 202211
18 202210
19 201410
20 20209

About Phing‐How Lou

Phing‐How Lou is a scholar working on Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 645 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (8 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (7 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (4 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (4 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (81 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (102 citations), Cell Biology (96 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (84 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (37 citations). Phing‐How Lou has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eliana Lucchinetti, Michael Zaugg, Martin Hersberger, Alexander S. Clanachan, Hélène Lemieux, Manoj Gandhi, Ahmed E. Awad, Lavinia Ionescu, Bernard Thébaud and Jianhua Feng. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, PLoS ONE, Anesthesiology, Molecular Nutrition & Food Research and American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact