Phillip Ng

588 citations
29 papers · 416 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Hemophilia Treatment and Research
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Papers in

Phillip Ng

28 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Phillip Ng
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Health 49
  • Hematology 46
  • Emergency Medicine 35
  • General Health Professions 83
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 28
Replace John Naish with:
John Naish United Kingdom
Álvaro Sosa Liprandi Argentina
Lindsay Kendall United Kingdom
Siddhartha Gogia India
Michael E. Hochman United States
Siméon Pierre Choukem Cameroon
S. Johansson Sweden
Jila Sadighi Iran
Kjell Sverre Pettersen Norway
Kevin Brooks United States
Phillip Ng relative to John Naish United Kingdom John Naish's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John Naish · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Ng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Ng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Ng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Ng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Ng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Ng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Ng. The network helps show where Phillip Ng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip Ng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip Ng Line = papers co-authored together Phillip Ng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200971
2 200365
3 200646
4 198836
5 201532
6 198828
7 198126
8 198124
9 201713
10 199412
11 19829
12 19976
13 20245
14 19865
15 19825
16 20054
17 19964
18 20094
19 19884
20 19814

About Phillip Ng

Phillip Ng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 29 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein purification and stability (4 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (4 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (49 citations), Hematology (46 citations), Emergency Medicine (35 citations), General Health Professions (83 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (28 citations). Phillip Ng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Nancy Wood, Kenneth M. McConnochie, Helen M. Hendy, Ruth L. Collins-Nakai, Neil E. Herendeen, Klaus J. Roghmann, Katia Noyes, Hongyue Wang, Gautam Mitra and Sarah Ronis. Their work appears in journals such as Gene Therapy, Blood, Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact