John Naish

34 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

John Naish
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Gastroenterology 23
  • Epidemiology 91
  • Rheumatology 40
  • General Health Professions 67
Replace Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez with:
Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez Canada
Ina Berndtsson Sweden
Evelyn Sutton Canada
Brijen J. Shah United States
Tzu‐Chi Hsu Taiwan
Esther A. Torres Puerto Rico
W. B. Spaulding Canada
Sofia Franco United States
Jenny Moloney United Kingdom
Malin Hansson Sweden
John Naish relative to Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez Canada Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Naish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Naish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Naish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Naish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Naish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Naish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Naish. The network helps show where John Naish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside John Naish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Naish Line = papers co-authored together John Naish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Intercultural consultations: investigation of factors that deter non-English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening.
1994108
2 1968106
3 195347
4 200220
5 199812
6 195911
7 199510
8 19977
9
Do practice-based preventive child health services affect the use of hospitals? A cross-sectional study of hospital use by children in east London.
20007
10
Derby's pioneering local pay spine.
19956
11 20096
12 20124
13
To catch a thief, abuser, killer.
19973
14 20023
15 19832
16
The Allitt case: getting close to the facts?
19932
17 19842
18 19722
19 19532
20 19902

About John Naish

John Naish is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Emergency Medical Services, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Systems and Challenges (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Microscopic Colitis (3 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (2 papers), Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (2 papers) and Air Traffic Management and Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (9 citations), Gastroenterology (23 citations), Epidemiology (91 citations), Rheumatology (40 citations) and General Health Professions (67 citations). John Naish has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Janie Brown, Brian T. Denton, B Hammer, P. Sturdy, Filomena Pereira, S A McKenzie, A. Picciotto, Makenzie L. Barr, Sandra Eldridge and Kath Moser. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nursing Standard, Public Health, Journal of Aircraft and Family Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact