John Naish

761 citations
49 papers · 581 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John Naish

39 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

John Naish
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Biochemistry 52
  • General Health Professions 185
  • Gastroenterology 26
  • Emergency Medical Services 33
Replace Lixia Dou with:
Lixia Dou China
Laura A. Rowe United States
Jennifer Tsang Canada
Jaime Hornecker United States
Norman Nyazema Zimbabwe
L. Bulusu United Kingdom
Kjell Sverre Pettersen Norway
Daniel Hunt United States
William Dana Flanders United States
Minjee Lee United States
John Naish relative to Lixia Dou China Lixia Dou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Lixia Dou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Naish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Naish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Naish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Naish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Naish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Naish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Naish. The network helps show where John Naish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Naish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Naish Line = papers co-authored together John Naish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Intercultural consultations: investigation of factors that deter non-English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening.
1994107
2 196893
3 199691
4 199758
5 199549
6 195346
7 200219
8 199516
9 199812
10 195911
11 199510
12
Do practice-based preventive child health services affect the use of hospitals? A cross-sectional study of hospital use by children in east London.
20007
13 19977
14 20096
15
Derby's pioneering local pay spine.
19956
16
To catch a thief, abuser, killer.
19973
17 20023
18 20123
19
The Allitt case: getting close to the facts?
19932
20 19842

About John Naish

John Naish is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Physiology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers), Healthcare Systems and Challenges (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Microscopic Colitis (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (9 citations), Biochemistry (52 citations), General Health Professions (185 citations), Gastroenterology (26 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (33 citations). John Naish has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include P. Sturdy, Janie Brown, Brian T. Denton, B Hammer, Filomena Pereira, Chris Griffiths, Peter Toon, Susan A. Dolan, Rumana Omar and Claire Griffiths. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nursing Standard, Journal of Aircraft, Family Practice and HPB.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact