Phillip Kim

799 citations
25 papers · 284 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Phillip Kim

23 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Phillip Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Biological Psychiatry 26
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 12
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 23
  • Business and International Management 6
  • Virology 13
Replace Emmanuel Oppong with:
Emmanuel Oppong Germany
Christopher T. Boughter United States
Sangyun Lee United States
China
Maha Zewail‐Foote United States
Neil Anthony United States
Sarah J. Austin United Kingdom
Е. В. Мартынова Russia
Deborah Douglas United States
Gérard Rossé United States
Phillip Kim relative to Emmanuel Oppong Germany Emmanuel Oppong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Emmanuel Oppong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Kim. The network helps show where Phillip Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip Kim Line = papers co-authored together Phillip Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201277
2 202165
3 198838
4 201228
5 201418
6
Biopsy Interpretation of the Bladder
201113
7 201510
8 20036
9
Family Religious Involvement and the Quality of Family Relationships for Early Adolescents. A Research Report of the National Study of Youth and Religion.
20035
10 20234
11 20223
12
Can You Lend Me a Hand? Social Support, Network Structure, and Entrepreneurial Action
20083
13 20232
14 20141
15 20021
16 20131
17 20231
18 20131
19 20231
20 20251

About Phillip Kim

Phillip Kim is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 25 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (26 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (23 citations), Business and International Management (6 citations) and Virology (13 citations). Phillip Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Keriann M. Backus, Howard E. Aldrich, Sanford P. Markey, Melvyn P. Heyes, Eila C. Skinner, Lei Wang, Yuanda Gao, Kenji Watanabe, Kenneth L. Shepard and Takashi Taniguchi. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, The Journal of Urology, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Annals of Vascular Surgery and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact