Phillip A. Fields

29 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

Phillip A. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 236
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 247
  • Reproductive Medicine 43
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 21
  • Social Psychology 43
Replace Brandy L. Dozier with:
Brandy L. Dozier United States
C. A. Eddy United States
Julie Brooks United Kingdom
Kevin D. Nusser United States
Elsa G. Garófalo Uruguay
J. P. Maltier France
S Tojo Japan
Gemma Madsen Australia
J Neculcea Canada
Jennifer M. Bowen United States
Phillip A. Fields relative to Brandy L. Dozier United States Brandy L. Dozier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Brandy L. Dozier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip A. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip A. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip A. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip A. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip A. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip A. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip A. Fields. The network helps show where Phillip A. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip A. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip A. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Phillip A. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983102
2 198054
3 198547
4 198746
5 198141
6 199838
7 199236
8 198527
9 198626
10 198621
11 199020
12 199717
13 200013
14 199111
15 199511
16 199511
17 199711
18 197910
19 19959
20 20059

About Phillip A. Fields

Phillip A. Fields is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Agronomy and Crop Science, Reproductive Medicine, Cancer Research and Immunology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy-related medical research (20 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1 paper), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (1 paper), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (1 paper) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (236 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (247 citations), Reproductive Medicine (43 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (21 citations) and Social Psychology (43 citations). Phillip A. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Fields, Lynn H. Larkin, Anna‐Riitta Fuchs, WAYNE B. WATKINS, Ciro Moraes Barros, Barry A. Ball, Lynn J. Romrell, Sornthep Tumwasorn, Glenn L. Wilson and Susan P. LeDoux. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Reproduction, Endocrinology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact