Phillip A. Fields

30 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Phillip A. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Occupational Therapy 90
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 222
  • Equine 22
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 307
  • Reproductive Medicine 56
Replace W.A. Chamley with:
W.A. Chamley Australia
J.R. Diehl United States
D. V. Illingworth United Kingdom
J Lukaszewska United States
S. Meredith United States
H.-O. Hoppen Germany
Robert E. Owens United States
L. Pitzel Germany
Brenda M. Schofield United Kingdom
G. Dijkstra Netherlands
Phillip A. Fields relative to W.A. Chamley Australia W.A. Chamley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
W.A. Chamley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip A. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip A. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip A. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip A. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip A. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip A. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip A. Fields. The network helps show where Phillip A. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip A. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip A. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Phillip A. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983100
2 198054
3 198547
4 198747
5 198141
6 199840
7 199236
8 198528
9 198627
10 198621
11 199020
12 199717
13 200013
14 199512
15 199711
16 199111
17 199511
18 197910
19 20059
20 19959

About Phillip A. Fields

Phillip A. Fields is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Agronomy and Crop Science, Occupational Therapy, Molecular Biology and Small Animals, having authored 30 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy-related medical research (19 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (9 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (7 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (4 papers), Animal health and immunology (2 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (2 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (2 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (90 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (222 citations), Equine (22 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (307 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (56 citations). Phillip A. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Fields, Lynn H. Larkin, Anna‐Riitta Fuchs, C. M. Barros, W.B. Watkins, Maarten R. Drost, Anthony L. Gard, Barry A. Ball, Glenn L. Wilson and Lynn J. Romrell. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Reproduction, Endocrinology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Glia and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact