Michael J. Fields

46 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael J. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 781
  • Parasitology 162
  • Reproductive Medicine 175
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 226
  • Social Psychology 145
Replace J. Sulon with:
J. Sulon Belgium
T. A. Parkening United States
Kerry Hull Canada
Bernadette Delaleu France
Stephen F. Lunn United Kingdom
A F Parlow United States
David G. Porter United Kingdom
E. L. Sheldrick United Kingdom
Richard E. Falvo United States
Edward E. Custer United States
Michael J. Fields relative to J. Sulon Belgium J. Sulon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
J. Sulon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Fields. The network helps show where Michael J. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael J. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Michael J. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986150
2 1985118
3 1965115
4 1983102
5 196568
6 198260
7 198259
8 198054
9 200454
10 199951
11 198547
12 198746
13 199546
14 199946
15 199642
16 199740
17 200239
18 199038
19
Factors Affecting Calf Crop: Biotechnology of Reproduction
200137
20 199236

About Michael J. Fields

Michael J. Fields is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Parasitology, Reproductive Medicine and Radiation, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (31 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (11 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Leptospirosis research and findings (2 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 paper), Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies (1 paper), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (781 citations), Parasitology (162 citations), Reproductive Medicine (175 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (226 citations) and Social Psychology (145 citations). Michael J. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Phillip A. Fields, Anna‐Riitta Fuchs, Richard Ivell, C. A. Santa Rosa, Mildred M. Galton, Catherine R. Sulzer, Mordechai Shemesh, Dietmar Richter, Laura M. Mudd and Derrel W. Clarke. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Reproduction, Endocrinology, Theriogenology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact