Michael J. Fields

54 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Michael J. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 711
  • Equine 48
  • Parasitology 173
  • Small Animals 177
  • Reproductive Medicine 180
Replace L. G. Moore with:
L. G. Moore New Zealand
J. Sulon Belgium
J. D. O'Shea Australia
H. M. Fraser United Kingdom
Bernadette Delaleu France
Gary D. Gray United States
Lloyd L. Anderson United States
A. S. McNeilly United Kingdom
W. Richard Dukelow United States
F. C. Buonomo United States
Michael J. Fields relative to L. G. Moore New Zealand L. G. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
L. G. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Fields. The network helps show where Michael J. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael J. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Michael J. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986142
2 1965116
3 1985107
4 198392
5 196567
6 198262
7 198256
8 200452
9 199949
10 198047
11 199546
12 198745
13 199643
14 199942
15 198542
16 199738
17
Factors Affecting Calf Crop: Biotechnology of Reproduction
200137
18 200236
19 199036
20 199235

About Michael J. Fields

Michael J. Fields is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, Genetics and Surgery, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (27 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (10 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (9 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (6 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (4 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers) and Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (711 citations), Equine (48 citations), Parasitology (173 citations), Small Animals (177 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (180 citations). Michael J. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Phillip A. Fields, Anna‐Riitta Fuchs, Richard Ivell, Catherine R. Sulzer, Mildred M. Galton, Mordechai Shemesh, Derrel W. Clarke, Mohan K. Raizada, Laura M. Mudd and Dietmar Richter. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Reproduction, Endocrinology, Theriogenology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact